Network Mapping as a Tool for Strategy & Engagement

converge with logo+website v6
This post provided by David Ehrlichman originally appeared on the James Irvine Foundation’s New Leadership Network Blog

We are becoming increasingly aware of the ubiquity of networks and their profound impact on shaping culture, transmitting information, and directing movements. Networks are inherent in an organization’s flow of information through its ranks, between an organization and its various customer segments, in the deals made in the senate, in our highway system and energy grid, in your social life, and across the many generations of your extended family. In truth, networks persist throughout every interaction you encounter. As collective impact and systems thinking takes hold, networks are also proving to be powerful tools for aligning stakeholders and tackling “wicked problems” of all kinds.

But how can networks be evaluated and analyzed? And how can we strategically shape and navigate our networks to align with our goals?

Today, new techniques are emerging that allow us to map and analyze networks and systems in a clear, visually engaging layout. For instance, the powerful open-source network analysis software Gephi has the backing of a strong community of co-developers and an ever-expanding suite of features. From my experiences mapping client networks and directing the Irvine New Leadership Network with colleagues Heather McLeod-Grant and David Sawyer, I have observed two particularly powerful and actionable applications of network mapping.

Evaluate Network Growth

“How healthy is our network? How has our network grown and evolved over time?”

By graphing the strength and density of connections within a network while tracking the evolving connections over time, network maps can evaluate the health and growth of networks far more effectively than raw numbers or first-hand accounts.

For example, mapping the network of a large school district’s Parent University System over the three years since its inception provided compelling evidence to the district school board that the Parent University System was cultivating a strong, growing network of engaged parents. Simultaneously, the network maps helped identify areas of structural weakness that could compromise the network’s vitality if not addressed. We found that the school district’s connection with a particular ethnic community of parents was heavily reliant on a single staff member – if that staff member were to leave, the school district would be at risk of losing ties to the entire community. Therefore, we recommended that the school district diversify their connections with that particular community, so their parent network would be robust enough to withstand inevitable staff departures.

Direct Network Engagement

“Who should we be connecting to who we aren’t already? How well are the various stakeholder groups within our network collaborating with each other?”

Network maps are also powerful tools for directing the engagement strategies of a network and answering the question “who else should we be connecting to?” Network maps filtered by characteristics such as sector, issue area, geography and language provide easily understandable “shared displays” that can help network leaders and members determine upon the best path forward.

Furthermore, community-finding algorithms can parse out groups of highly connected nodes within networks. This valuable data can help identify factions or cliques forming within networks, and highlight the shortest path to connect with a particular group or person of interest. For instance, network maps have helped the Irvine New Leadership Network visualize the leadership structure across Fresno County and direct program selection decisions by highlighting the essential community stakeholder groups that are not yet sufficiently integrated into the network.

Taylor CorbettNetwork Mapping as a Tool for Strategy & Engagement